Government agencies are facing a space problem. Hybrid work policies have changed how employees use offices, but many agencies are still operating with office footprints designed for pre-pandemic work models. The result? Large portions of government real estate are sitting underutilized while budgets remain tight.
“43% of government entities plan to reduce office space by 30% or more in the next three years.”
- CBRE Global Workplace Insights 2024
This shift presents both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge is ensuring that office reductions do not disrupt operations or public services. The opportunity is using occupancy data to make informed decisions, ensuring that space is allocated efficiently without unnecessary costs.
With hybrid work policies in place, many government offices now have more desks than employees using them. This leads to inefficient space use and higher operating costs.
To optimize office space, agencies should:
📌 Example: A state agency found that while every employee had an assigned desk, occupancy studies showed that desks were only used 40% of the time. By transitioning to a shared workspace model, they reduced office size by 25% while maintaining productivity.
Not all government spaces function the same way. Administrative offices may see reduced in-person use, but public-facing service centers still require accessible, well-staffed spaces.
Agencies should:
📌 Example: A municipal government discovered that one of its satellite offices received less than 10% of its expected foot traffic. After a short-term occupancy study, they merged services with a nearby location, saving operational costs while maintaining accessibility.
Reducing office space comes with risks. If not planned carefully, it can lead to overcrowded remaining offices, inefficient workflows, and employee dissatisfaction.
To avoid this:
“Government agencies must balance cost savings with accessibility to ensure that reduced office footprints do not impact public service delivery.”
- CBRE Global Workplace Insights 2024
Q: How can agencies determine which offices to downsize?
A: By conducting short-term occupancy studies that measure actual space usage, including how often desks, meeting rooms, and service areas are used.
Q: What if office reductions lead to overcrowding?
A: Space reductions should be tested incrementally. Pilot programs can assess whether consolidation efforts are effective before making permanent changes.
Q: How often should government offices review space utilization?
A: Every 6-12 months, especially as hybrid policies evolve and staffing levels change.
Government agencies cannot afford to make real estate decisions based on assumptions. Without data, offices risk being either too large and costly or too small and inefficient.
This is where Vantage Space provides value. Unlike long-term sensor-based tracking, Vantage Space offers quick, human-led occupancy studies that provide both quantitative data (how space is used) and qualitative insights (how employees and visitors interact with that space).
By conducting snapshot occupancy studies, government agencies can:
With the right data, agencies can reduce real estate costs while maintaining efficiency and accessibility.
Looking to optimize your office footprint? Start an occupancy study with Vantage Space today.
Discover more insights about workplace efficiency, space utilization, and data-driven decision making.
Explore more →Enhance public sector workspace efficiency and resource allocation through data-driven space management.
See industry insights →Make informed decisions about space management and maintenance scheduling with real-time occupancy data.
See department solutions →Get started for free and get 250 FREE CREDITS to run a test study or put towards your next project!