Scope & Methodology: This report covers the period of Q3 2024, from July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024. During this time, the Vantage Space platform was used to collect 1,051,470 observations across 24,055 spaces, in 19 countries. The data is analyzed globally and broken down into three key regions: EMEA, APAC, and AMER.
Our data is collected through visual observations, capturing two types of occupancy: "active" (individuals physically present in a space) and "passive" (signs of life, such as belongings indicating recent use). We combine both active and passive occupancy to calculate our "occupancy figure," which represents the capacity that is not available for use by others.
In Q3 2024, occupancy levels declined across all regions compared to Q2, with the global average falling to 32.0%—a notable 7.0 percentage point drop. APAC remains the most actively occupied region at 37.0%, though it experienced the steepest quarter-on-quarter decline alongside EMEA. EMEA and AMER followed with 29.0% and 26.0% average occupancy respectively. The relatively stable passive occupancy in EMEA suggests ongoing hybrid work patterns, while AMER’s low figures reflect continued adjustments to space allocation and return-to-office policies.
Region | Average Occupancy (%) |
---|---|
Global | 32.0% (-7.0%) |
EMEA | 29.0% (-9.0%) |
APAC | 37.0% (-9.0%) |
AMER | 26.0% (-7.0%) |
Table 1: Average Occupancy by Region. Note: The percentage changes are calculated based on the previous quarter’s data.
Chart 1: Average Occupancy by Region and Overall
Space Type Definitions: Because offices vary widely - especially in how each company labels their own spaces - we've standardized our definitions to keep everything clear and consistent. Below you'll see how we define each space category.
Work space occupancy remains highest in APAC (41.0%), where individual workstations continue to see relatively high usage despite a regional dip. Globally, meeting space occupancy dropped sharply to 21.0%, a 14.0-point decline, suggesting significant underuse of formal collaboration areas, particularly pronounced in AMER (-19.0 points) and APAC (-18.0 points). Interestingly, “other” spaces saw a slight global increase (+3.0%), driven perhaps by employees seeking alternative, informal work settings. AMER saw low occupancy across all space types, reinforcing trends toward potential downsizing or strategic reconfiguration.
Region | Work Space (%) | Meeting Space (%) | Other Space (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Global | 33.0% (-8.0%) | 21.0% (-14.0%) | 43.0% (+3.0%) |
EMEA | 28.0% (-13.0%) | 31.0% (0.0%) | 38.0% (-4.0%) |
APAC | 41.0% (-7.0%) | 15.0% (-18.0%) | 46.0% (-4.0%) |
AMER | 29.0% (-4.0%) | 22.0% (-19.0%) | 26.0% (-8.0%) |
Table 2: Average Occupancy by Space Type. Note: The percentage changes are calculated based on the previous quarter’s data.
Chart 2: Average Occupancy of Meeting Type Spaces by Region and Overall
Chart 3: Average Occupancy of Work Spaces by Region and Overall
Meeting rooms are spaces designed for collaborative activities, such as team meetings or client presentations. A continuing trend is the use of large meeting rooms for small groups, creating inefficiencies in how space is used and perceived.
Region | Average Meeting Size (Attendees) |
---|---|
Global | 2.7 (-2.3) |
EMEA | 3.0 (-8.8) |
APAC | 2.5 (+0.1) |
AMER | 2.4 (+0.4) |
Table 3: Average Meeting Size by Region. Note: The changes are calculated based on the previous quarter’s data.
The global average meeting size decreased significantly to 2.7 attendees, reinforcing the need for smaller, more agile meeting rooms. EMEA experienced the most dramatic shift with a drop of 8.8 attendees, indicating a sharp correction following previously higher average meeting sizes. In contrast, APAC and AMER saw marginal increases, though small meetings remain dominant across all regions.
Chart 4: Global Meeting Room Capacity vs Usage
Chart 5: EMEA Meeting Room Capacity vs Usage
Chart 6: APAC Meeting Room Capacity vs Usage
Chart 7: AMER Meeting Room Capacity vs Usage
Across all regions, a mismatch persists between meeting room size and actual usage. Globally, 44.0% of meeting rooms are designed for five or more occupants, while over 75% (42.2% + 27.6% + 10.3% + 6.6% = 86.7%) of observed meetings involve four or fewer participants. EMEA stands out with 68.0% of its rooms built for larger groups (size 4+), yet less than 10% (6.9% + 4.1% + 2.7% + 1.9% + 2.3% + 1.1% + 3.9% = ~23%) of meetings exceed four attendees—highlighting a clear opportunity to rebalance meeting room inventories in favor of smaller, more flexible spaces.
As of October 1, 2024, workplace occupancy trends suggest a continued shift toward flexibility and selectivity in office usage, possibly influenced by typical post-summer adjustments and evolving hybrid work models. The global decline in occupancy—particularly in meeting spaces—aligns with rising hybrid work adoption and a strategic rethinking of in-person collaboration needs. EMEA’s dramatic drop in average meeting sizes and APAC’s stable work space utilization illustrate divergent regional adjustments. The data underscores the persistent need for a better match between room types and employee behavior, particularly in rightsizing meeting spaces. Organizations that prioritize adaptability, data-informed decisions, and employee-centric design will be best positioned to navigate these ongoing shifts.
About Vantage Space: Vantage Space is the world's leading workplace occupancy study app, designed to empower organizations with data-driven insights into their workplace usage. Simple to set up, easy to use, Vantage Space enables workplace leaders to gather the data they need to make strategic decisions about space planning and design.
Discover more insights about workplace efficiency, space utilization, and data-driven decision making.
Explore more →Get started for free and get 250 FREE CREDITS to run a test study or put towards your next project!